Wireshark mailing list archives

Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ?


From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:42:29 +0000

My gcc build is complaining that FT_SYSTEM_ID is missing from 3 switch
statements.  I'm not sure I properly understand how it is used, so would
appreciate if someone could take a quick look at this patch?  If there are
no objections I will commit it later...

Thanks,
Martin

Attachment: semcheck.c.diff
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: