Wireshark mailing list archives
Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ?
From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson () googlemail com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:42:29 +0000
My gcc build is complaining that FT_SYSTEM_ID is missing from 3 switch statements. I'm not sure I properly understand how it is used, so would appreciate if someone could take a quick look at this patch? If there are no objections I will commit it later... Thanks, Martin
Attachment:
semcheck.c.diff
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ? Martin Mathieson (Dec 23)
- Re: Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ? mmann78 (Dec 23)
- Re: Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ? Alexis La Goutte (Dec 23)
- Re: Is this patch to semcheck.c valid (handling FT_SYSTEM_ID) ? mmann78 (Dec 23)