Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector andFileshark
From: okordy <okordy () o2 pl>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:05:49 +0200
Dnia 18 kwietnia 2013 17:56 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> napisaĆ(a):
...except in those places where the UI *should* be different. For example, when showing a JPEG, Wireshark doesn't have multiple items in the "packet list" pane, because the JPEG is in, for example, a single HTTP message. However, in Fileshark, the dissector might want to have separate items in the list pane for different parts of the JPEG file.
Of course, yes. But some components doesn't need to be reimplemented (for example, hex browser).
I think it would be reasonable to make it possible to use the same dissectors as for WiresharkYes, that's a lot of the point of Fileshark.
I just wanted to emphasize this. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector and Fileshark okordy (Apr 18)
- Re: GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector and Fileshark Guy Harris (Apr 18)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector andFileshark okordy (Apr 18)
- Re: GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector andFileshark Michal.Labedzki (Apr 19)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector andFileshark okordy (Apr 18)
- Re: GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissector and Fileshark Guy Harris (Apr 18)