Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:05:06 -0700
On Apr 15, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Sonny Tavernier <sonny.tavernier () gmail com> wrote:
I worked on a proposal for the project "Improved Fuzzing": an improved fuzzing function which aims to improve the efficiency and the coverage of the tests. The more the input trace files are diverse and varied, the more it will be effective, so it seems your idea is complementary to my proposal. I'm wondering if you could comment on my proposal so we could improve it together. Here is the link : http://hacknowledge.lescigales.org/proposal/
That page appears to be blank. Is this: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/pintool the Pin to which you were apparently referring? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Sonny Tavernier (Apr 15)
- Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Evan Huus (Apr 15)
- Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Guy Harris (Apr 15)