Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage
From: Sonny Tavernier <sonny.tavernier () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:23:35 +0200
I'm not familiar with PIN but I from your proposal I understand it's something like the valgrind framework? The idea is certainly an interesting one, though if my understanding is correct it sounds like an awful lot of work for one summer - I could be wrong though.
Thank you for your quick reply. Yes Pin is a dynamic binary instrumentation framework like Valgrind but it provides a rich API set which allows to build powerful tools easily. Actually, identifying all the branches of a running program, which is the main function of the "improved fuzzer", can be achieved whith a small Pin tool (~100 lines). The remaining is only algorithms. If I understood your idea well, both can be implemented in 12 weeks for sure. I'll take a closer look at randptk utility. Feel free to suggest improvements or additional ideas. Sonny
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Evan Huus (Apr 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Sonny Tavernier (Apr 15)
- Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Sonny Tavernier (Apr 16)