Re: RRC filters

[Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>]

2012/9/26 Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>

>  Pascal Quantin skrev 2012-09-26 19:41:
>
>
>
> 2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio <lucio.digiovannantonio () gmail com>
>
> > Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe "container" could be better?
> >
> > Regards
> > Lucio
> Hi Lucio,
>
> thanks for your suggestion, I like it. I will wait a few days to see if
> someone suggests a better wording (or a better approach than my patch
> proposal in bug 2402 comment 10) and then commit it.
>
> Regards,
> Pascal.
>
> For fields like this
>     { &hf_rrc_dl_UM_RLC_Mode_01,
>       { "dl-UM-RLC-Mode", "rrc.dl_UM_RLC_Mode",
>         FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
>         "DL_UM_RLC_Mode_r5", HFILL }},
>     { &hf_rrc_dl_UM_RLC_Mode_02,
>       { "dl-UM-RLC-Mode", "rrc.dl_UM_RLC_Mode",
>         FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
>         "DL_UM_RLC_Mode_r6", HFILL }},
>
> Using the blurb or dl_UM_RLC_Mode_01 should be better than the current
> scheme.

Thanks for the suggestion Anders. I will explore using the blurb and
falling back to _container when no blub is available and see what it gives.

Regards,
Pascal.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe