Re: RRC filters

[Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>]

Pascal Quantin skrev 2012-09-26 19:41:
> 2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio <lucio.digiovannantonio () gmail com 
> <mailto:lucio.digiovannantonio () gmail com>>
>
>
>     Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe "container" could be
>     better?
>
>     Regards
>     Lucio
>
>
> Hi Lucio,
>
> thanks for your suggestion, I like it. I will wait a few days to see 
> if someone suggests a better wording (or a better approach than my 
> patch proposal in bug 2402 comment 10) and then commit it.
>
> Regards,
> Pascal.
For fields like this
    { &hf_rrc_dl_UM_RLC_Mode_01,
      { "dl-UM-RLC-Mode", "rrc.dl_UM_RLC_Mode",
        FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
        "DL_UM_RLC_Mode_r5", HFILL }},
    { &hf_rrc_dl_UM_RLC_Mode_02,
      { "dl-UM-RLC-Mode", "rrc.dl_UM_RLC_Mode",
        FT_NONE, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,
        "DL_UM_RLC_Mode_r6", HFILL }},

Using the blurb or dl_UM_RLC_Mode_01 should be better than the current 
scheme.
Regards
Anders
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>               mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe