Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs


From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:49:38 -0800


On Nov 30, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com> wrote:

How does the incomplete status get updated when the additional information is provided ? manually ?

With the bug database I referred to, it was done manually by the provider of the information.

If manually, is this OK in practice or do peole forget to update the status ?

I think it worked pretty well in practice, although people did forget on occasion.  Of course, internal people who 
filed the bugs pretty much knew the rules, and for externally-filed bugs, Developer Technical Support (ooh what a 
giveaway) may have updated the status when the external developer provided the information.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: