Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:49:38 -0800
On Nov 30, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com> wrote:
How does the incomplete status get updated when the additional information is provided ? manually ?
With the bug database I referred to, it was done manually by the provider of the information.
If manually, is this OK in practice or do peole forget to update the status ?
I think it worked pretty well in practice, although people did forget on occasion. Of course, internal people who filed the bugs pretty much knew the rules, and for externally-filed bugs, Developer Technical Support (ooh what a giveaway) may have updated the status when the external developer provided the information. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- fuzz failures not generating bugs Jeff Morriss (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Gerald Combs (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Bill Meier (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Gerald Combs (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Bill Meier (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Guy Harris (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Guy Harris (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Gerald Combs (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)