Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Query
From: Tyson Key <tyson.key () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:11:09 +0000
Hi Krishnamurthy, Whilst I'm not a core developer, I don't see why that would be a problem. (In fact, that's how I submitted some of my own dissectors). Tyson. On 1 March 2012 03:01, Krishnamurthy Mayya <krishnamurthymayya () gmail com> wrote:
Hi all, Is it ok if we create a new bug in wireshark bugzilla to say that we are working on writing the decoding module for these protocols and attach the patches, packets after we are done with it?? I just wanted to avoid the duplicate work getting done by many. I am currently working on writing the decoding modules based on few RFCs and will actually take some time to submit it back. Thanks in advance for the reply. Thanks and regards Krishnamurthy Mayya ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Fight Internet Censorship! http://www.eff.org http://vmlemon.wordpress.com | Twitter/FriendFeed/Skype: vmlemon | 00447934365844 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Query Tyson Key (Mar 01)
- Re: Query Alexis La Goutte (Mar 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Query krishna hegde (Mar 16)
- Re: Query Bill Meier (Mar 16)
- Fwd: Query krishna hegde (Mar 19)
- Re: Query Ed Beroset (Mar 16)
- Re: Fwd: Query 阿超 (Mar 19)
- Re: Fwd: Query Jeff Morriss (Mar 19)