Re: Problem with protocol in udp por 3800

[Pedro Fuentes Ortega <pfuentesor () gmail com>]

Yes, the frames are displayed but but aren't dissected by the dissector.

2012/6/20 Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>

> On 6/20/2012 9:52 AM, Pedro Fuentes Ortega wrote:
>
> > .
> > Hello,
> > This is the my first post and do not know if is the right way to question.
> > In the company I work we used two proprietary protocols to communicate,
> > in a private network,  diferent equipments. One protocol uses udp port
> > 3500 and the other the udp 3800. I have tried to encode two dissector.
> > The code that uses port 3500 works perfectly, but the other does not. I
> > did the same in the two just changing the port number but nothing. The
> > protocol that runs on port 3800 is registered by that I see in the list
> > of protocols but does not display any information.
> > Any suggestions what I might be going on.
> > Sorry for my English
>
> When you say "nothing", do you mean that frames with UDP port 3800 display
> but aren't dissected by your dissector ?
>
> ______________________________**______________________________**
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/**lists/wireshark-dev<http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev>
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://wireshark.org/mailman/**options/wireshark-dev<https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev>
>            mailto:wireshark-dev-request@**wireshark.org<wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org>
> ?subject=**unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe