Re: Problem with protocol in udp por 3800

[Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>]

On 6/20/2012 9:52 AM, Pedro Fuentes Ortega wrote:
> .
> Hello,
> This is the my first post and do not know if is the right way to question.
> In the company I work we used two proprietary protocols to communicate,
> in a private network,  diferent equipments. One protocol uses udp port
> 3500 and the other the udp 3800. I have tried to encode two dissector.
> The code that uses port 3500 works perfectly, but the other does not. I
> did the same in the two just changing the port number but nothing. The
> protocol that runs on port 3800 is registered by that I see in the list
> of protocols but does not display any information.
> Any suggestions what I might be going on.
> Sorry for my English


When you say "nothing", do you mean that frames with UDP port 3800 
display but aren't dissected by your dissector ?

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe