Wireshark mailing list archives
idl2wrs generation of display filters
From: mmann78 () netscape net
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:31:12 -0400 (EDT)
I was running checkfiltername.pl and discovered that the idl2wrs generated dissectors don't follow the convention of using the filter name registered with the protocol as the start of any display filter name. Was this just an oversight, or was it intentional? I believe the attached patch will fix the problem, but I don't know the first thing about the idl2wrs generation or how to regenerate the necessary dissector files, so I thought I'd send it out for comment.
Attachment:
wireshark_gen.py.patch
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- idl2wrs generation of display filters mmann78 (Jul 24)
- Re: idl2wrs generation of display filters Christopher Maynard (Jul 25)
- Re: idl2wrs generation of display filters Jeff Morriss (Jul 26)
- Re: idl2wrs generation of display filters mmann78 (Jul 26)