Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 43908: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-ftp.c

[Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>]

Maybe just calling packet-data is the right way to go here?

 ciao
      Jörg

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 04:44:17AM +0000, martinm () wireshark org wrote:
> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=43908
>
> User: martinm
> Date: 2012/07/21 09:44 PM
>
> Log:
>  Calling tvb_format_text() for binary data segments (c1400 bytes) was
>  *very* slow (in a profiled run where FTP data is carried over LTE
>  MAC/RLC/PDCP/IP/TCP, this one function call was 20% of overall runtime).
>  
>  Have limited to call to ITEM_LABEL_LENGTH, as that is all that
>  will be displayed anyway.  As per comment, I'm not convinced that doing
>  this for binary FTP data segments is worthwhile at all.  It doesn't
>  even display as hex.
>
> Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
>   Changes    Path            Action
>   +6 -3      packet-ftp.c    Modified
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
>              mailto:wireshark-commits-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe