Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: tshark vs dumpcap

From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:13:58 -0700


On Oct 30, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Marco Zuppone wrote:

The official WireShark study guide states that dumpcap consumes less memory..


...because it doesn't dissect packets and keep any persistent data needed to do that.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

tshark vs dumpcap Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)
- tshark display filter / time Stuart Kendrick (Oct 30)
  - Re: tshark display filter / time j.snelders (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Shawn T Carroll (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Marco Zuppone (Oct 30)
  - Re: tshark vs dumpcap Guy Harris (Oct 30)
- Re: tshark vs dumpcap Jim Aragon (Oct 30)