Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:40:56 -0600
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 06:37:03PM +0000, Chris Maynard wrote:
Any concerns about backward-compatibility? Are folks accustomed to using rtt with tshark instead of srt? Should we support either one going forward, or is it OK to abandon rtt?
(without thinking it through very much...) I would say to change it and mention the change in the release notes. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Guy Harris (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Stephen Fisher (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Sake Blok (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 23)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 23)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Guy Harris (Mar 21)