Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Nettl HP-UX
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:31:00 -0700
On Jun 29, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Chris Maynard wrote:
Not quite sure what to do in capture_eth() though, as I'm not completely sure what that function is for; maybe you could have a look?
The capture_xxx() functions are for doing a very quick and dirty dissection of packets while we're capturing traffic, so that instead of just showing a count of packets as we capture, we can show a count of particular types of packets. Therefore, the right thing to do with invalid packets would be to count them as "other" packets and not bother doing any further dissection - just as we do when doing a real dissection. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Nettl HP-UX, (continued)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 20)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Kevin Cullimore (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)