Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach
From: Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:34:09 +0100
Hello Bill, Guy, Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy () alum mit edu):
2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual data. I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just part of the captured data (similar to the code in your original patch).
This is the approach used by packet-radiotap.c
At this point, I prefer the second approach. The Linux USB dissector now uses that, as of revision 32534; switching to that cleaned things up.
thanks for the feedback. I'll define the pseudo-header for DVB-CI, apply for a DLT and modify my dissector accordingly. Best regards, Martin ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Guy Harris (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Martin Kaiser (Feb 11)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Martin Kaiser (Feb 24)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Jeff Morriss (Feb 25)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Martin Kaiser (Feb 25)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)