Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:48:34 +0200
Hello Michael, On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 07:39:57PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
from what I could see is that the functions (I #if 0 out) are never called. I just wanted to keep the code if it turns out that it is needed when Irene is working on implementing the suggestions. I've put an item on our ToDo list to finally cleanup the source code. I'm wondering why our compilers did not complain...
You probably didn't have PCAP_REMOTE set - on libpcap systems that is a rare thing. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Joerg Mayer (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Michael Tuexen (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Joerg Mayer (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Michael Tuexen (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Joerg Mayer (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Michael Tuexen (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Joerg Mayer (Aug 06)
- Re: Still compile problems with capture_dlg.c Michael Tuexen (Aug 06)