Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c
From: Chris Maynard <chris.maynard () gtech com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:31:03 +0000 (UTC)
Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@...> writes:
That's the common way to show the application protocol in SIP message bodies. Most well known is Session Description Protocol in Session Initiation Protocol messages: SIP/SDP.
But dissect_ansi_637_trans_app() calls col_set_str(), not col_append_str(), and I don't see a col_set_fence() in packet-sip.c, so I don't think we'd see "SIP/IS-637-A" in the protocol column, but merely, "/IS-637-A". Is that the intent? Or am I missing something and "SIP/IS-637-A" would be displayed after all? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Bill Meier (Apr 04)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Chris Maynard (Apr 05)
- Re: Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Jaap Keuter (Apr 05)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Chris Maynard (Apr 06)
- Re: Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Jaap Keuter (Apr 06)
- Re: Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Jaap Keuter (Apr 05)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Q re a possible bug for someone familiar with packet-ansi_637.c Chris Maynard (Apr 05)