Re: Permanent Bytes/Packets handling enhancement in NetFlowV9/IPFIX

[Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>]

Motonori Shindo skrev 2011-04-06 06:55:
> Hi,
>
> Current NetFlow V9/IPFIX dissector treats IN_BYTES (IE=1) and
> IN_PERMANENT_BYTES (IE=85) exactly in the same way. The same applies
> to IN_PKTS (IE=2) and IN_PERMANENT_PKTS (IE=86). However,
> IN_BYTES/IN_PKTS and IN_PERMANENT_BYTES/IN_PERMANENT_PKTS have
> different semantics so they should be distinguishable when they are
> displayed or specified in a filter. Please find attached the patch
> which does that.
>
> Regards,
>
> ---
> Motonori Shindo
You should attach your patch to a bug report at 
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla
It does not apply though:
patching file epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c
patch: **** missing line number at line 5: @@ -%ld,%ld +%ld,%ld @@
Regards
Anders
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>               mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe