Re: Any interest in a USB-encapsulated AT/Hayes Commands dissector?

[Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:25:48PM +0100, Tyson Key wrote:

> It's very rough; and I don't know what the best way to deal with 
> displaying and manipulating strings of an unknown length is -

Looking at the http dissector may be of help here.

> although it nicely filled a need that I had at the time (identifying 
> AT commands traffic amongst a proprietary protocol and other "line 
> noise", in order to filter them out).
>
> If there's any interest, I'd be willing to try and clean it up for 
> potential submission into mainline Wireshark.

Sure, why not contribute it.  I'm sure someone will find it useful at 
some point.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe