Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: protocol field declaration


From: Lange Jan-Erik <Jan-Erik.Lange () haw-hamburg de>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 12:58:09 +0100

It is discrete data. Perhaps this field must be broken up in future, too. But for now it would be good having it just 
as a hex value in a seperate field.


________________________________________
Von: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] im Auftrag von Stephen Fisher 
[steve () stephen-fisher com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. November 2010 18:49
An: Developer support list for Wireshark
Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] protocol field declaration

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:28:39PM +0100, Lange Jan-Erik wrote:

I want to have a field in my protocol, that is 18,25 Bytes long (18
Bytes and 2 Bits aditionally). Which type can I use therefore?

When I use FT_BYTES I can't use bitmasking for getting the 2 Bits. And
Using FT_INT64 is too short for 18 Bytes.

How can I realize this field?

What type of data does the field have in it?  It sounds like more than
one value is in there.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: