Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: regarding sgsap procotol
From: Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:22:42 +0100
Hi, That would be TS 29.118 I think, if you have a sample trace you could Open up an enhancment bug at https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/ and some one might Take an interest in it. Regards Anders -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher Sent: den 14 november 2010 16:58 To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] regarding sgsap procotol On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 08:44:19PM +0530, Rajesh Alluri wrote:
Does any one know when SGSAP protocol will be added in wireshark? (in which version of Wireshark) I checked in the latest Wireshark but couldnt able to find. please let me know if any have information?
There is no way of telling unless someone is already working on it. See the FAQ: "Q 1.11: Are there any plans to support {your favorite protocol}?" http://www.wireshark.org/faq.html#q1.11 ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- regarding sgsap procotol Rajesh Alluri (Nov 14)
- Re: regarding sgsap procotol Stephen Fisher (Nov 14)
- Re: regarding sgsap procotol Anders Broman (Nov 15)
- Re: regarding sgsap procotol Stephen Fisher (Nov 14)