Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch
From: "RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR **" <lars.ruoff () alcatel-lucent com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:27:05 +0200
Good point. Actually it does listen on port 80/TCP! And i am able to build up the TCP connection. But the HTTP request seems kind of to be bounced back!? Strange. See trace attached. My PC is IP 192.168.0.97 and the device is 192.168.0.239. I tried http://192.168.0.239, as well as http://192.168.0.239/admin/ and http://192.168.0.239/config/, just in case. The trace contains also the exchanges with the config tool (UDP ports 63321, 63322). Several other IP adresses appear in this, although there's only my PC and the switch connected P2P. Lars -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Kevin Cullimore Sent: jeudi 20 mai 2010 13:17 To: wireshark-users () wireshark org Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch On 5/20/2010 5:54 AM, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** wrote:
Hmmm.... have you captured the configuration traffic generated by the configuration utility? ;-)It's something proprietary (not yet dissected ;-) ) over UDP via broadcast!
Does nmap (or equivalent software) indicate that it's listening on ANY tcp ports?
Lars -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: jeudi 20 mai 2010 11:02 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch On 20 mei 2010, at 10:44, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** wrote:Yes, indeed, forgot to mention that and that's what can be considered a serious drawback. Only a Windows configuration utility is shipped and I haven't yet found out how to configure the switch otherwise.Bummer... as I have become a Mac user... Hopefully the configuration utility works from within a Windows VM :-)A simple http://[address] or telnet [address] yields no success. The manual doesn't mention anything of that sort either.Hmmm.... have you captured the configuration traffic generated by the configuration utility? ;-)Another thing that would have made it perfect would have been PoE. To be clear: It does NOT provide PoE.For a nice PoE capable mirroring switch, have a look at Betty's post on LMT: http://www.lovemytool.com/blog/2010/04/review-of-dualcomm-5-port-pass-through-port-mirroring-switch-by-betty-dubois.html Cheers, Sake ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list<wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list<wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
netgear-gs105e-connection-attempt.zip
Description: netgear-gs105e-connection-attempt.zip
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Jaap Keuter (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Sake Blok (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Jan Van Damme (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (May 20)
- Re: Looking for aportable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Clerveaux, Marie (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Sake Blok (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Kevin Cullimore (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch Sake Blok (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch mr.k (May 20)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch Sake Blok (May 23)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendly hub/switch Sake Blok (May 30)
- Re: Looking for a portable sniffing-friendlyhub/switch Jan Van Damme (May 20)