Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: clang analysis


From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 16:08:12 -0600

On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 11:56:50PM +0300, Kaul wrote:

Oy Vey! I've just built clang from SVN and now it finds 3354 bugs. 
Regretfully, its report is not file based - it just shows them one 
after another, not sorted by file.

I'm not even sure how to open a bug on so many files, and it would be 
quite difficult go through each file and report the bug. The report ( 
6 HTMLs, uncompressed) is 1.8MB - should I perhaps zip and file a 
single bug? I'm almost done with the fixes to packet-ssl.c, but there 
are so many others...

Sorry, I wasn't clear on what I meant.  If you could open a bug just 
saying that you're running clang version <whatever> and it found 
thousands of bugs, that's enough :).  It's just a hint to others to run 
clang on their own and see what can/should be fixed.


-- 
Steve
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: