Re: Regarding TCP Options

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Mar 9, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Karthik Balaguru wrote:

> I have been continuing the process of analysis by using a latest
> version of wireshark. I just now verified with Version 1.2.5 (SVN Rev
> 31296) on Windows OS, it seems to display the 'TCP options' field
> properly. But, I wonder why the 0.99.0 version (linux) does not
> display it.  Just as you have conveyed that it is displaying for
> 0.99.6(Linux) version, i too think that it should work for 0.99.0
> version also.

Perhaps there was a bug in 0.99.0 that caused it not to display the TCP options correctly for your particular trace?  
(The code to display TCP options has been in Ethereal/Wireshark for a long time, so it's not that 0.99.0 can't display 
TCP options.  There might be *particular* TCP options that it doesn't know about, but it should at least be able to 
display them as raw data.)

The current version of Wireshark on *ALL* platforms is 1.2.6; 0.99.0 - and even 0.99.6! - are very old (0.99.0 dates 
back at least 3 years - it's so old that it wasn't even called "Wireshark" then, it was still "Ethereal").
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe