Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 33300: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-ber.c

[Graeme Lunt <graeme () lunt uk com>]

Hi,

Certainly a UAT looks very sensible.
I wasn't familiar with them until you pointed them out.
I'll have a look.

Graeme

2010/6/23 Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>

> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM,  <gal () wireshark org> wrote:
> > Log:
> >  Configuration to allow the definition of an OID name and associated
> syntax.
>
> Great news!  I have been thinking about this for a long time.
>
> >  The configuration file is a glib key-value file, with the dotted OID
> used as
> >  the group, and two keys defined, "name" and "syntax".
>
> What about using a UAT for entering this values?  Then we can have a
> drop-down with valid syntax values, and we have more control over the
> input.
>
>
> --
> Stig Bjørlykke
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe