Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:44:50 -0700
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
After some more digging I found that the HTTP dissector does not search for and call subdissectors if there are no unprocessed bytes left in the packet. Does this mean that it's impossible to do any custom processing of HTTP GET requests in a subdissector,
Yes. What sort of custom processing are you trying to do? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Guy Harris (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Guy Harris (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Stig Bjørlykke (Jul 19)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)