Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type?

From: Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:20:05 +0200

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Tarjei Knapstad
<tarjei.knapstad () gmail com> wrote:

However, my dissector (or heurisic dissector) never gets called in any
of these cases.


What happens if you disable the http dissector?
Or remove port 80 from the http preferences?


-- 
Stig Bjørlykke
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread:

Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 19)
  - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Guy Harris (Jul 20)
    - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
- Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Stig Bjørlykke (Jul 19)
  - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)
    - Re: Correct way of adding a HTTP subdissector on port 80 with no content type? Tarjei Knapstad (Jul 20)