Wireshark mailing list archives
tshark memory
From: Abhijit Bare <abhibare () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:26:31 -0700
Hi all, I have a problem with tshark memory usage. I need to use tshark for a read filter. However, it looks like tshark reads in the entire input file in memory. Is this correct? My traffic file is huge (at least 2.5 TB uncompressed). You can't really read in such a file and, in my opinion, tshark doesn't have to, as applying read filter can be done on each individual packet. But every time I do this, tshark memory and virtual memory reported by top become really large and output rate (using -w option) becomes very slow. Do you expect this? Is there any way to avoid this? Thank you, Abhijit
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tshark memory Abhijit Bare (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Guy Harris (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Abhijit Bare (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Guy Harris (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Anders Broman (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Abhijit Bare (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Anders Broman (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Abhijit Bare (Jan 19)
- Re: tshark memory Guy Harris (Jan 19)