Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Thinking of some changes to packet-scsi.c ...


From: Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 14:29:07 +0000 (UTC)

Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...> writes:

If there are any suggestions for other changes, let me know.

Hi Richard.  It looks like there are other bit-oriented fields besides
hf_scsi_control that could benefit from this as well: hf_scsi_inquiry_flags,
hf_scsi_modesel_flags, ...

There also seem to be a lot of proto_tree_add_text() calls (I count 186 of
them).  I haven't looked at them all, but I suspect most would be better added
using proto_tree_add_item() so those fields could be filterable as well.

I saw that you posted a patch on Thursday.  Could you open up a bug report and
submit the patch(es) there instead?  I think it will make it easier to track and
the patches won't get lost.  Thanks.

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: