Re: Automatic test for a dissector DLL

["news.gmane.com" <AndreasSander1 () gmx net>]

"Douglas Wood" <doug.wood () ieee org> wrote in message 
news:37D3213E-8407-4AC8-9149-EA6BBF68EC68 () ieee org...
> But, wireshark is organized to call the PDML print code with all the 
> fields.  It is very easy to "flatten" the hierarchy and choose what to 
> keep.  It is possible that the CSV print code is easier to modify and may 
> do what you want with no modification.  Either that mode did not exist 
> when I started working my own modifications, or I just was clueless about 
> where to get flattened data.

Thanks, I don't want to modify Wireshark. I will have to parse this XML 
output to take only what I need.

--
Andy



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe