Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: data link type option in wireshark
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:46:29 -0700
On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:30 AM, upendra.allu () wipro com wrote:
Thanks a lot for you reply. Let me put my question more clearly. In my current Wireshark, when decoding my own plug-ins, the order of dissection is: Frame Ethernet Internet Protocol User Datagram Protocol (UDP) My-plugin Now for dissecting My-plugin, I have to dissect from Ethernet to My-plugin every time.
Yes, that's the way Wireshark works.
All my plug-ins is on top IP layer (either on UDP or on SCTP). Now for decoding My-plugin every time I have to start decoding from a common Data Link type (Ethernet) which is time consuming. So I want to know that is it possible to directly decode My-plugin?
Not if your capture file is a capture of Ethernet traffic. Wireshark cannot magically figure out that a given Ethernet packet happens to contain an IP packet without, at minimum, looking at the Ethernet type/length field; it cannot figure out that a given IP packet is a UDP packet without, at minimum, looking at the IP protocol number field; and it cannot figure out that a given UDP packet is a packet for your protocol without, at minimum, looking at either the UDP port numbers (if your dissector is registered with a UDP port or you've used Decode As) or the contents of the payload (if your dissector is a heuristic dissector). ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- data link type option in wireshark upendra.allu (Aug 17)
- Re: data link type option in wireshark Guy Harris (Aug 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: data link type option in wireshark Guy Harris (Aug 18)