Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: mean opinion score
From: ankur aggarwal <ankur.mast.frn () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:23:24 -0400
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:29 AM, RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** < lars.ruoff () alcatel-lucent com> wrote:
Hi, That's true. But just for completeness, know that there is also another ITU-T recommendation, "G.107 - The E-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning" (not freely available from ITU-T though), which describes how to calculate a MOS from objectively measured parameters. These include network- (loss, delay, jitter) as well as device- (TELR, ELR etc.) and environment- (noise etc.) specific parameters. At least for the network related impairments, a network analysis tool like Wireshark could help in principle in that it could provide these calculation, assuming the other parameters stay constant and can be used with reasonable default values. Regards, Lars Ruoff-----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris Sent: lundi 12 avril 2010 20:40 To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] mean opinion score On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:16 AM, ankur aggarwal wrote:Can anybody help me in finding MOS through wireshark or anyother s/w which work on my intranet. (offline mode). Wireshark is software, not a human being, and thus cannot itself generate a mean opinion score; the same applies to any other software. The mean opinion score is calculated based on *subjective* evaluations of sound quality by human listeners; see the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_opinion_score and the ITU-T recommendation to which it refers, P.80: http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.800-199608-I/en You could, at best, have Wireshark play back the audio and have various listeners evaluate it, and then calculate the MOS based on their evaluations. ______________________________________________________________ _____________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
-- With Regards Ankur Aggarwal Research intern Optical Zeitgeist Laboratory Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS) - ÉMT 800, de la Gauchetière Ouest, bureau 6900 Montréal, QC, H5A 1K6 CANADA Ph: +1 514 966-2661 E-mail: ankur.1066 () gmail com Web: www.zeitgeistlab.ca Group Member Page: http://zeitgeistlab.ca/doc/groupmembers.html
Attachment:
G107.doc
Description:
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- mean opinion score ankur aggarwal (Apr 12)
- Re: mean opinion score mr.k (Apr 12)
- Re: mean opinion score ankur aggarwal (Apr 12)
- Re: mean opinion score Guy Harris (Apr 12)
- Re: mean opinion score RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (Apr 13)
- Re: mean opinion score ankur aggarwal (Apr 14)
- Re: mean opinion score RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** (Apr 13)
- Re: mean opinion score mr.k (Apr 12)