Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: mean opinion score


From: "mr.k" <sigafoose () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:54:49 -0400

Ankur,

The mean opinion scoring is usually an agreed upon standard based on
your own baseline of what is "good" media.

If you set up a system of scoring around the quality of the media
streams with in the network (i.e. latency, jitter, loss % etc.) I dont
see why you couldn't come up with your own determiner that could be
used as a tool for measuring acceptable standards that a protocol
analyzer (like wireshark) can assist with.

If I am thinking about this right, straight forward MOS is test based
upon media output quality, how it looks or how it sounds. So does not
lend well to protocol analyzer in the traditional sense.

Hope this helps.

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:16 AM, ankur aggarwal
<ankur.mast.frn () gmail com> wrote:
Can anybody help me in finding MOS through wireshark or any other s/w which
work on my intranet. (offline mode).


--
With Regards

Ankur Aggarwal
Research intern
Optical Zeitgeist Laboratory
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS) - ÉMT
800, de la Gauchetière Ouest, bureau 6900
Montréal, QC, H5A 1K6
CANADA

Ph: +1 514 966-2661
E-mail: ankur.1066 () gmail com
Web:     www.zeitgeistlab.ca
Group Member Page: http://zeitgeistlab.ca/doc/groupmembers.html



___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: