Re: FC Malformed packets

[<Tim.Poth () bentley com>]

I believe I read an article with a similar issue involving a router, it was ether a bug or bad ram (more I think about 
it the more I think it was bad ram)
Does a MAC address show up in the capture, might give you a direction on what device to go smack.
Thanks
tim

From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of George 
Peaslee
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:41 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] FC Malformed packets

Actually, I have seen that. It was a problem the device I was capturing. It used a template to build the IP packet and 
the template wasn't getting filled in properly.
----- Original Message -----
From: Wright, John<mailto:John.Wright () kaobrands com>
To: wireshark-users () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:32 PM
Subject: [Wireshark-users] FC Malformed packets

Hello
Anyone ever see this before. Nearly 25 percent of all packets that I capture from my switches says it is:
 FC malformed packet
There is no source addr or dest addr. All zeros

________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org<mailto:wireshark-users () wireshark org>>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe