Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: FC Malformed packets
From: "George Peaslee" <gpeaslee () verizon net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:40:50 -0600
Actually, I have seen that. It was a problem the device I was capturing. It used a template to build the IP packet and the template wasn't getting filled in properly. ----- Original Message ----- From: Wright, John To: wireshark-users () wireshark org Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:32 PM Subject: [Wireshark-users] FC Malformed packets Hello Anyone ever see this before. Nearly 25 percent of all packets that I capture from my switches says it is: FC malformed packet There is no source addr or dest addr. All zeros ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- FC Malformed packets Wright, John (Nov 18)
- Re: FC Malformed packets George Peaslee (Nov 18)
- Re: FC Malformed packets Tim.Poth (Nov 18)
- XSPAM: RE: FC Malformed packets Wright, John (Nov 18)
- Re: FC Malformed packets George Peaslee (Nov 18)