WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re[2]: looking for stats
From: Matt Szubrycht <matt () bmihosting com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:56:50 -0700
Hello Eoin, Watch out, SEO spin doctors may jump on this and some of us be in for a rough ride ;) Great Weekend Everyone, Matts Friday, August 26, 2005, 8:07:14 AM, you wrote:
I've seen terms like:
Vulnerability assessment. Application Risk assessment. Security quality assessment. Application exploit analysis Tiger team testing black hat analysis poo testing
On 26/08/05, Andrew van der Stock <vanderaj () greebo net> wrote:The trick is that researchers do not use the word "hacking". I know I don't use the term as it widely and incorrectly used. As we cannot claim the word back from the media, I do not use it. With consistent effort on our part, maybe "hacker" will end up like "prithee" or "apothecary" and other out of favor words. thanks, Andrew On 26/08/2005, at 8:10 AM, Robin Wood wrote:tried that and not got anything useful, thats why I'm trying here. On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 16:57 +0100, Dave Spencer wrote:Have you actually tried tried googling for it, if not try "hacking statistics" "hacking statistics bbc" "hacking statistics cnn"
-- Best regards, Matt mailto:matt () bmihosting com
Current thread:
- looking for stats Robin Wood (Aug 25)
- RE: looking for stats Moran (Aug 25)
- Re: looking for stats Serban Ghita (Aug 25)
- Re: looking for stats Jeremiah Grossman (Aug 25)
- Re: looking for stats Dave Spencer (Aug 25)
- Re: looking for stats Dave Spencer (Aug 25)
- Re: looking for stats Robin Wood (Aug 26)
- Re: looking for stats Andrew van der Stock (Aug 26)
- Re: looking for stats Eoin Keary (Aug 26)
- Re[2]: looking for stats Matt Szubrycht (Aug 27)
- Re: looking for stats Michael Boman (Aug 27)
- RE: looking for stats Moran (Aug 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: looking for stats Ha, Jason (Aug 25)