RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent

[<owasp () moiler com>]

In which case would 'prior art' relating to individual sections of the
patent still be relevant?

Glyn.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pentester2189114 () hushmail com 
> [mailto:pentester2189114 () hushmail com] 
> Sent: 21 January 2004 05:08
> To: sullo () cirt net
> Cc: mark () curphey com; webappsec () securityfocus com
> Subject: RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:16:45 -0800 sullo () cirt net wrote:
> > Does that mean, therefore, that they cannot encorce their patent 
> > against products or methodologies that only use a portion of 
> what the 
> > patent covers?
> No, it does not.  Sanctum can enforce their ownership rights 
> against anyone that infringes on any single or combination of 
> claims in the patent if they choose to do so.
>
>
>
> Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
> FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
>
> Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger 
> https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?> subloc=messenger&l=434
>
>
> Promote security and make money with 
> the Hushmail Affiliate Program: 
> https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427