WebApp Sec mailing list archives

Re: HIPAA security requirements


From: David Nester <david () icrew org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:42:59 -0600

Matt,

I work for a large institution that is also playing in the HIPAA
"playground".  My one suggestion would be -- if you plan on writing a
contract, have it reviewed by your/a legal team.  Protect yourself...Period.

Just a thought.

David



From: Matt Kenigson <president () sheergenius com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:06:49 -0600
To: ONEILL David J <David.J.Oneill () state or us>, "webappsec () securityfocus com"
<webappsec () securityfocus com>
Subject: Re: HIPAA security requirements

David (and all):

First of all, thank you for all your great replies.  This is a great list.

I think David's suggestion (quoted below) is a good one.  The language
in my current boilerplate contract that I think will need to be modified
is thus:

"Provider will work with Client to jointly ensure that all Services are
performed in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, any applicable regulations
(proposed or final) promulgated thereunder, and any other applicable
laws and regulations."

I'm thinking that a better clause would be one that specifically
mentions that we will take all reasonable measures to insure that the
app will not be vulnerable to known attacks as of <date>.  Then again,
part of me wonders whether such language should be in my boilerplate at
all.  After all, if the client is lax about enforcing security
compliance, why should I shoulder the burden for them?  (Other than it's
the right thing to do -- but I'm thinking about contractual liability here).

Thanks,

Matt

Looking into the future, I think that you can rest assured the if you do due
security diligence now you should be safe.  Clauses such as "warrantied
against volnerablities and exploits that are know as of <data>" would most
likely cover you for most issues.  This way the customer does not get the
idea
that you are warrantying against what is unknown.
 





Current thread: