RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent

["Levenglick, Jeff" <JLevenglick () fhlbatl com>]

"If the interpretation of the patent is true (IANAL), then using much of the discussion that has taken place on this 
list for services and many of the tool that are used to proove those concepts (like SPIKE, PAROS etc) over the past few 
years looks like they are in violation. "


I see.. 

1) So what you are saying is that your list is/could be illegal. (hmm you really thought that anything based
on pen-testing would be legal?)

2) People should not use this list because there is a chance that they can be sued based on their
opinions.

As I stated, this should have been sent to a legal list. 


-----------------------------------------
This e-mail message is private and may contain confidential or privileged information.