Re: Flash sites

[Jeremiah Grossman <jeremiah () whitehatsec com>]

A flash only web site is no more or less secure than a static HTML site 
with
the same permission as you've describe. Both sites do nothing
from a server interactivity point of view, which is where web app
vulnerability reside.

the word "safest", becomes somewhat arbitrary.




On Wednesday, September 3, 2003, at 09:14 AM, John Madden wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> If a web site contains only flash files and has no
> write permissions to modify those flash files, no
> default files or other potentially dangerous scripts
> can we say that is the "safest" form of a web site ?
>
> Are there any other concerns in auditing a flash based
> site ?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
> _________