RE: key material

["Greg Kilford" <greg_kilford () hotmail com>]

So u are suggesting 1024/2048 bits size/length for A to seed the PRNG and 
then after that the output stream O could be drawn to provide the bits for 
RSA 1024/2048 bits modulo key materials generation?

A few of us are inclined towards this, but a few of my pals seem to think 
weirdly.  They feel that 64/128 or even 192 bits would have sufficed.  Their 
argument is that the symmetric and asymmetric crypto "strength" would means 
that such length/size of A would match up.  A few years back, Schneier 
commented in a paper on the comparison of crypto "strength" between 
symmetric and asymmetric key sizes (something like 80bits symm key is 
equivalent to 1024bits asymm RSA key).  But I really disagree that the 
crypto strength has anythin to do with RNG.  What does everyone think?


> From: "Burton M. Strauss III" <BStrauss () acm org>
> To: <vuln-dev () securityfocus com>
> CC: "Greg Kilford" <greg_kilford () hotmail com>
> Subject: RE: key material
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 06:48:46 -0500
>
> Remember, while a PRNG may GENERATE more bits, the initial random pool caps
> the total randomness.
>
> Suppose you generate 5 numbers using any PRNG you like.  If the seed is 
> only
> 1 bit(0 or 1), there are only TWO patterns you will see.  Period.  If the
> seed is two bits, there are 4 patterns, etc.
>
> This surfaced recently in some of the lottery machines - small seed space
> and the machines were frequently reset - meaning that the 'quick pick'
> tickets covered only a small % of the number space.
>
> -----Burton
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Kilford [mailto:greg_kilford () hotmail com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:29 PM
> > To: vuln-dev () securityfocus com
> > Subject: key material
> >
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I was juz discussing with my pals the other day on the
> > appropriate initial
> > input bit size to seed a PRNG of the structure below for it to be used 
> to
> > generate the random bits for RSA key material of modulus 1024
> > bits or 2048
> > bits.  Anyone know what would be the ideal length/size of A so
> > that there is
> > sufficient entropy to generate the key material for RSA 1024/2048
> > bits keys?
> >
> > A: Initial input seed of x bit size and fed into the 3DES x9.17
> > PRNG in 64
> > bit blocks.
> > B: A constant key of 128 bits (112 bits effective).  Does not change 
> with
> > each loop of output block O.
> > C: Initialization vector - 64 bits size with initial fixed value and fed
> > back with each loop.
> > O: Output of 64 bit block with each loop for RSA 1024/2048 key material.
> >
> > Initial total of x bits as seed
> > (feeding in 64-bit block feed)
> >             A
> >             |
> >            \|/
> > x9.17 PRNG   V
> > ----------------------
> > |                    |
> > |                    |<------ B (128bits with 112 bits effective)
> > : Constant
> > value for all loops
> > |                    |
> > |       3DES         |
> > |                    |
> > |                    |<-------
> > |                    |       |
> > ----------------------       |
> >         |          |          | C (64 bit IV) : Initial fixed IV.
> > Changed/feedback with every loop.
> >         |          |          |
> >         |          -----------|
> >         |
> >        \|/
> >         V
> >         O
> > Output Random Stream
> > (in 64 bit blocks)
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
> >

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail