Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 14:45:07 -0500
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 21:37:02 EST, George Capehart said:
Faraday cages and Tempest shields aren't. Most institutions that I know of that are serious about that solve the problem by RF-proofing the areas they want to protect. Try using a cell phone or pager in some sensitive areas of some of the larger banks . . . ;-)
Somebody else in private mail mentioned a hospital ICU - if the threat model is "interference with a heart monitor", a Faraday cage doesn't do much good.... As I said - without knowing more about the threat model, we can't really help the original poster much... -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY k w (Oct 31)
- RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Rob Shein (Nov 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Gustavo Alberto (Oct 31)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY kamal southall (Nov 01)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY George Capehart (Nov 01)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY jove (Nov 01)
- TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Bartholomew Simpson (Nov 03)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY ATD (Nov 04)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY KF (Nov 26)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Chip Mefford (Nov 26)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Gene (Nov 27)
- Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY Chip Mefford (Nov 26)