Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns55 () hardakers net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 23:15:47 -0800
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002 10:39:14 -0500, KF <dotslash () snosoft com> said:
dotslash> so far on UCD-4.2.2 I have the following... I am now looking dotslash> at 4.2.3 something is definately wrong in the logging dotslash> functions of both when compiled from the .tar.gz... the dotslash> default mandrake binary did not have this issue, I dotslash> recompiled it on my own. I have my config.cache and dotslash> snmptrapd.conf if anyone wants them. Just taking a guess here, but is your glibc up to date? I think I've narrowed your problem down to a bug in vsnprintf and I don't think it's in the ucd-snmp code itself. -- "Ninjas aren't dangerous. They're more afraid of you than you are of them."
Current thread:
- UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification KF (Feb 16)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Wes Hardaker (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Laurence Brockman (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Wes Hardaker (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification KF (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Wes Hardaker (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Laurence Brockman (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Laurence Brockman (Feb 18)
- Re: UCD-4.2.2 and UCD-4.2.3 snmptrapd verification Wes Hardaker (Feb 18)