Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: ls bug.
From: Ehud Tenenbaum <analyzer () 2xss com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 16:04:34 +0200
Hey again... Well no point to flame someone for making a mistake no big deal we are sorry for posting this ls bug which is not a bug. We already updates the scanner for this shell expending so this incident would not occur in the future, nevertheless there is no need to flame us, we are only trying to do our best. thanks for the information, until next time:P Petrus : 2 ways to delete -ls ? well here is one rm -rf /full/path/-ls second one rm -rf ./-ls :P "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
$ touch -- -i $ rm * And see what happens. Please get a clue. BB, you let this one through just for the entertainment value, no?
Oh well too bad there are people like that one who just have to show how smart they are when someone else mistaken. Thats all for now, 2xs Security team. -- ------------ Ehud Tenenbaum C.T.O & Project Manager 2xs LTD. Tel: 972-9-9519980 Fax: 972-9-9519982 E-Mail: ehud () 2xss com ------------ Have A Safe Day
Current thread:
- ls bug. Ehud Tenenbaum (Feb 15)
- Re: ls bug. Chris Faulhaber (Feb 15)
- Re: ls bug. Blue Boar (Feb 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ls bug. Ehud Tenenbaum (Feb 15)
- Re: ls bug. Crist J. Clark (Feb 16)
- Re: ls bug. Wodahs Latigid (Feb 15)