Re: illegal cheer (was: Re: CodeGreen beta release (idq-patcher/antiCodeRed/etc.)

[Markus Kern <markus-kern () gmx net>]

Meritt James wrote:
> THAT is an informative statement!  If a bit of consideration for the law
> was made, there would be many fewer vulnerabilities in the first place.

How would consideration for the law reduce _vulnerabilities_?

I have to agree with Michael Rudel.
When we're discussing the ethics/morals of something current laws are
irrelevant.
Laws are deduced from the outcome of such discussions (or that's the way 
I think it should be).

regards,
Markus Kern

> But thanks for the job security!
>
> "Michael R. Rudel" wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > It is illegal under current law, but
> > that doesn't mean jack to me.
>
> [snip]