Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: Time-to-patch vs Disclosure method


From: terry white <twhite () aniota com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT)

on "10-17-2001" "Mark Kennedy" writ:

: But just because they are the source of the vulnerability does not
: undermine their valid concerns on how that vulnerability is disclosed.
  
... that of "COURSE" assumes the "ONLY" source of such information
found within 'professional security circles'.
  
    i find of interest, "culp's" suggestion of leveraging income
vis-a-vis 'disclosure philosophy'.  that elevates stupidity to art.
clearly, threatening the 'security-savvy', 'technically proficient', and
'intellectually tenacious' seen as apropos to the situation at hand.
  
    m$ is blessed with an ignorant market, however, is mistaken in
thinking that synonomous with stupidity.  i suspect that distinction will
be made clear when XP finds widespread use.  there's nothing more
dangerous than a lot of ignorant people asking questions, who won't
accepting the rote corporate answers ...


-- 
... i'm a man , and i can change ,
    if i really have to , i guess ...



Current thread: