Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer


From: Mike Sues <msues () cinnabar ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 07:14:48 -0800

Ditto for me; didn't work for Win98SE with all security updates
plus running IE build 5.50.4522.1800. It appeared as though IE
truncated the long URL; I used a string of 20,000 and then
21,000 long A's.

Mike Sues
Senior Network Security Analyst
Cinnabar Networks Inc
http://www.cinnabar.ca
ph :613.720.4842
fax:613.236.2506

-----Original Message-----
From: VULN-DEV List [mailto:VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM]On Behalf Of
Benjamin Branch
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 9:53 AM
To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer


Running Win98 SE with all updates, running IE build
5.50.4143.0600 and could
not reproduce the the problem.  I the only thing i got was a 404 File not
Found error when I tried it.  Nothing more.  Sorry I couldn't be of more
help.


Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bojan Zdrnja" <Bojan.Zdrnja () FER hr>
To: <VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer


I tryed the same on my Windows 2K machine.
I found out that IE doesn't let you enter more then 2048 characters in
Address field (this is probably some protection against buffer
overruns).
I
will test it on other machines and let you know.
Interesting thing is that I tested it on server which had apache running
on
and I got same message as Felipe Franciosi, about Forbidden message.

Bojan Zdrnja

IT/Security Consultant
Faculty of EE and CS, Zagreb, Croatia

-----Original Message-----
From: VULN-DEV List [mailto:VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM]On
Behalf Of Eric
D. Williams
Sent: 5. veljaea 2001 17:46
To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM
Subject: Re: Potential overflow in Internet Explorer


I was able to reproduce on Windows NT 4.0

System:

Microsoft Windows NT
4.00.1301 (SP6 + all relevant Fixes)
IE 5 5.00.3105.0106 (SP2 etc.)

http://www.thewebserver.com/[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa (and lots of
'a's didn't count
yet)

0x61616161 on the Call Stack (bad sign :)

Eric

On Saturday, February 03, 2001 2:13 PM, Robbert Muller
[SMTP:mjrider () ENSCHEDE COM] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:12:20PM -0800,
joetesta () HUSHMAIL COM wrote:
<SNIP>
    I am using version 5.50.4522.1800 on Win98 SE with
all critical updates
installed.  I attempted to reproduce this crash on three
other machines
without success.  Their version numbers where:

        5.00.2614.3500,
        5.50.4134.0100,
        5.50.4134.0600

    It seems as though this may be some sort of regression error,
bad mix of software, or both.  Can anyone else reproduce this?
5.504522.1800 (Winme+all updates) doesn't crash


--
Robbert Muller           | Never let a luser on your console.
mjrider@enschede dot com | Because that means they're in your room.
uin: 9659330             | finger mjrider () mjrider student utwente nl
PGP-key 0x2F634245       | for the PGP key





Current thread: