Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Catalyst switches
From: suid () SUID KG (suid () SUID KG)
Date: Tue Jun 13 23:17:09 2000
: It would be interesting if there was a vulnerability that allowed you to : break the VLAN definitions.. I know many companies that practically run : their entire networks together into several Catalysts via VLANS :)Secure
What about redefining the VLANs in the config? Of course that would require getting control of the switch.
WARNING: Users who have administritive access to your systems may perform administritive functions!!!! :P~~ suid
Current thread:
- Exploit code for PalmOS, (continued)
- Exploit code for PalmOS Aviram Jenik (Jun 14)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Matthew King (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Jay Tribick (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Andy Murren (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches rpc (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Rostislav Opocensky (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Saso (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Mudge (Jun 14)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Jeremy Guthrie (Jun 14)
- Problems with: xcdroast, gatos, xkobo, xbill, iagno, ++ Elias Levy (Jun 14)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Mudge (Jun 14)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches suid () SUID KG (Jun 13)
- Update on TopLayer Advisory nawk (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Blue Boar (Jun 13)
- Re: Cisco Catalyst switches Martin Hamilton (Jun 14)