Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Re: New DOS attack vs ppp links


From: Eric Andry <eric () WINCOM NET>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 11:38:10 -0400

Thanks for your five cents Brad.. Well spent, and all true...

But there may be a larger problem with the encapsulation attack. This
would be a kind of smurf+USSR Labs code. It has to do with dsl
connections that use PPPoE (Or PPPoX). It's pretty easy to gather a big
list of DSL IPs... Look at some of the naming schemes (e.g.:
adsl-208-191-156-188.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net ,
adsl-gte-la-216-86-202-119.mminternet.com , 3ff8e2d5.dsl.flashcom.net ,
63-217-212-127.sdsl.cais.net , you get the Idea...) you can guess a
pretty wide range of the reverse lookups / IP's that are using DSL
technology. Though not all of these will be using PPPoE, a large number
do because the easy of use. If you can get double the traffic from a
good sized list of these addresses, spoofing the source address to some
target machine, you could cripple it without using up much of your own
bandwidth. Mind you this would definitely not be as effective as smurf,
but because of the Amplification of packets from high (read decent)
bandwidth connections , you could take down your friendly neighborhood
big backbone from something smaller (don't think 56K dialup is going to
do it for you this time though). The code I have for this is hardly
tested, and I don't plan on releasing it because quite frankly it's not
mine.. It's TFreaks Smurf + Ussr Labs code released previously on this
list,  pretty much mixed together.. Only thing I did is the mixing and
the smallest amount of actual code myself. Maybe Ussr Labs will want to
release another version of their PPP link killer to do the same. Have to
say thanks to TFreak and Ussr Labs since I used almost all their code.
Anyways, it's something to think about at least.

Regards,

Eric Andry

Brad Spengler wrote:

uhmm..."New DOS attack" isn't quite appropriate.  This kind of attack has been known for quite
some time now.  afaik it is effective on any kind of link, and it's a ppp encapsulation pattern for
ping.  just doesn't seem like the kind of stuff i expect from ussr labs.  Well there's my 5 cents,
for what they're worth.

--
Eric Andry
Network/System Admin.
Wincom


Current thread: